'Fully realizing that the George W. Bush Presidential administration would eventually create public outcry, could elites have sought to recruit an apparently unifying political figure, to manipulate the masses? In history, such figures though apparently populist messages, have sought to inspire “cults of personality”
'Through the engineering of cults of personality, in the name of the need to “make sacrifices“ for the “greater good“, and a “better tomorrow“, elites can seek to exploit times of economic crisis or societal stress, by talking about “change“. The mounting "sacrifices" eventually morph into an authoritarian regime, totalitarian control, necessitated for the creation of a "warrior society", that primarily exists to "vanquish its enemies".
'Any aspiring President, who suggests that they support progressive "change" in America, while embracing the apparent industry of lies associated with the "War on Terror", is an apparent impostor champion of progressive change. Americans could prevent a further worsening economic meltdown with international reach, by taking back their society from war mongering myth-makers, who commercially profit from a state of war; and the manufacture of redundant atomic and other weapons of mass destruction, that could destroy the world several times over. That state of war would make trillions of dollars available for critical civilian domestic areas, which include high education, healthcare, public infrastructure, and other areas.' (The Canadian article).
media-underground.net